Skip to content
View neuron7xLab's full-sized avatar
🧠
🧠

Block or report neuron7xLab

Block user

Prevent this user from interacting with your repositories and sending you notifications. Learn more about blocking users.

You must be logged in to block users.

Maximum 250 characters. Please don’t include any personal information such as legal names or email addresses. Markdown is supported. This note will only be visible to you.
Report abuse

Contact GitHub support about this user’s behavior. Learn more about reporting abuse.

Report abuse
neuron7xLab/README.md
neuron7x brain

⊛ ════════════════════ ⊛
𝙍𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙧 · 𝙀𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙚𝙧
⊛ ════════════════════ ⊛

Independent  ·  neuroscience  ·  AI  ·  financial systems


Gmail UKR Proton


About

Every repo here is an active line of research — not a portfolio piece. Work ships only after climbing hypothesis → theory → fact, with both confirmed and rejected results kept on record.

What you're looking at

Real experiments with verified results and public failures. Negative results are tagged, not deleted. Pre-registration is on, fail-closed reporting is on. Every claim has a SHA-256-anchored ledger entry; two runs of the same code produce the same hash.

How it's built

Note

Hypothesis → Theory → Fact. No code enters a stack before climbing the ladder.

  1. Hypothesis  — state the prediction and the gate it must pass.
  2. Theory  — minimal falsification harness: in-sample effect · out-of-sample time-split · sanity-check against literature ceilings.
  3. Fact  — binary verdict. Phase-2 OOS below gate → REJECT. No maybe-later.

If Phase-2 OOS collapses more than versus Phase-1 in-sample, that alone rejects. The temporal split is the load-bearing discipline.

Closed loop · seven stages  — every substantive change passes all seven before merge
# Stage Check
1 Verify mypy --strict · ruff · invariant registry
2 Test pytest · property tests · effect sizes
3 Validate real data · surrogate tests · honest null results
4 Verify SHA-256 ledger · two runs, same hash
5 Optimize benchmarks, only after correctness
6 Calibrate thresholds vs baselines · Youden-J · generalisation gap
7 Integrate green CI on 3.11 + 3.12 · clean history

A reviewer walking the branch can reconstruct why the change is correct, not only that it compiles.

Ten axes of done  — every artefact scores on all ten before it ships
# Axis What it asks
1 Elegance minimal moving parts, no incidental complexity
2 Aesthetics visual and structural pleasure to read
3 Beauty symmetry, no forced abstractions
4 Simplicity the obvious thing, not the clever thing
5 Precision exact contracts; types narrow the truth
6 Adaptability composable; extends without rewrite
7 Resistance refuses to degrade under adversarial input
8 Coherence every source of truth tells the same story
9 Completeness every source of truth covers everything
10 Reproducibility same bytes twice under the same seed

Axes 1–6 check how the artefact reads. Axis 7 checks how it holds under attack. Axes 8–9 check whether self-descriptions agree and cover. Axis 10 checks whether the system produces the same bytes twice.

Adversarial orchestration.  Creator → Critic → Auditor → Verifier. Each layer is an independent witness of its own error. witness ≠ actor, even inside one system.

Warning

Fail-closed audit. A diagnostic that flips a verdict (sign flip, threshold retune, direction change) is a hypothesis, not a conclusion. Run the full multi-test audit, including thresholds that may fail. If the audit fails → revert. Relaxing a threshold silently turns fail-closed into fail-open.

Zero tech debt contract.  A task is not closed while any of these is true: lint/types/tests not green · TODO/FIXME/dead code left · docstrings or tests missing on changed code · CI red on the PR · physics/brand/invariant guards not passing.


One law

A system earns the right to act if and only if
it is a living gradient at the edge of criticality.

ΔV > 0   ∧   dΔV/dt ≠ 0     —     invariant YV1

Featured work

kuramoto-cross-asset  ·  Cross-asset Kuramoto phase-coherence regime indicator + full falsification audit (4-stage null battery, paired block-bootstrap, variant ablation, walk-forward). Strategy survives OOS as SUPPORTED_SCOPED; phase-coherence-specific causal claim REJECTED. Negative results kept on record.

Architecture

Adversarial Orchestration

Live · NTI

Noetic Throughput Index — live snapshot NTI (Noetic Throughput Index) — externally-verifiable productivity readout.
Four falsifiable components: K_bits (LZMA-compressed bits of non-test diff) · C_ext (tier-weighted externally-verified closures, E0–E4) · D_div (Shannon entropy over (repo, top_dir, ext) buckets) · R_repeat (1 − mean pairwise minhash-Jaccard over hunks).
Daily root sha256 published on the badge.

Reproduce or challenge:   python -m vicr_bench duel --vs <your-handle> --window 30
neuron-stream-tracker


vintage pocket watch  productivity pulse — 7-month vs 7-day rolling, window 2025-10-14 → 2026-05-14

Pinned Loading

  1. GeoSync GeoSync Public

    Geometric market intelligence platform — Kuramoto synchronization · Ollivier-Ricci curvature · fractal dynamics · neuro-symbolic control · institutional-grade quantitative research infrastructure

    Python 1 1