Skip to content

Added core indexes property tests for partial#188

Open
vic-tsang wants to merge 3 commits into
documentdb:mainfrom
vic-tsang:core/index/partial/tests
Open

Added core indexes property tests for partial#188
vic-tsang wants to merge 3 commits into
documentdb:mainfrom
vic-tsang:core/index/partial/tests

Conversation

@vic-tsang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR contains:

  • core indexes property tests for partial

Ref:

Signed-off-by: Victor [C] Tsang <vitsangp@amazon.com>
@vic-tsang vic-tsang requested a review from a team as a code owner May 15, 2026 06:15
@documentdb-triage-tool documentdb-triage-tool Bot added compatibility test Compatibility test related enhancement New feature or request labels May 15, 2026
@documentdb-triage-tool
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Auto-triaged by documentdb-triage-tool.

Applied: compatibility test, enhancement
Project fields suggested: Component test-coverage · Priority P2 · Effort L · Status Needs Review
Confidence: 0.80 (mixed)

Reasoning

component from path globs (test-coverage); effort from diff stats (1944+7 LOC, 7 files); LLM: Adds new property-based test coverage for partial indexes, expanding the compatibility test suite as tracked by Issue #27.

If a label is wrong, remove it manually and ping @patty-chow so the rules can be tuned. The bot will not re-label items that already have component labels.

Signed-off-by: Victor Tsang <vitsangp@amazon.com>
@vic-tsang vic-tsang requested a review from karthikvarma22 May 15, 2026 21:07
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@eerxuan eerxuan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add a test for "_id indexes cannot be partial indexes"

Signed-off-by: Victor Tsang <vitsangp@amazon.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

compatibility test Compatibility test related enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants