Develop#2
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
WalkthroughThis PR updates connection validation to mark HTTP ChangesConnection Validation Fix and Release
🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 3❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 2 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@Apps.Figma/Connections/ConnectionValidator.cs`:
- Line 27: The current validation in ConnectionValidator (var isValid =
response.StatusCode != System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Forbidden &&
response.StatusCode != System.Net.HttpStatusCode.NotFound) incorrectly treats
many failure statuses as valid; change the logic to consider only successful
HTTP responses as valid by using response.IsSuccessStatusCode (or checking
StatusCode is in the 2xx range) inside the same method that performs the
request, and ensure you handle a null/failed response appropriately before
checking IsSuccessStatusCode.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: f4cc551b-6922-4240-9db2-41fa60614fec
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Apps.Figma/Apps.Figma.csprojApps.Figma/Connections/ConnectionValidator.cs
| var response = await client.ExecuteAsync(request, cancellationToken); | ||
|
|
||
| var isValid = response.StatusCode != System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Forbidden; | ||
| var isValid = response.StatusCode != System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Forbidden && response.StatusCode != System.Net.HttpStatusCode.NotFound; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Treat only successful HTTP responses as valid connections.
Line 27 still marks several failed responses as valid (e.g., 401, 429, 5xx). Validation should be success-based, not “not 403/404”-based.
Proposed fix
- var isValid = response.StatusCode != System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Forbidden && response.StatusCode != System.Net.HttpStatusCode.NotFound;
+ var isValid = ((int)response.StatusCode >= 200) && ((int)response.StatusCode < 300);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| var isValid = response.StatusCode != System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Forbidden && response.StatusCode != System.Net.HttpStatusCode.NotFound; | |
| var isValid = ((int)response.StatusCode >= 200) && ((int)response.StatusCode < 300); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@Apps.Figma/Connections/ConnectionValidator.cs` at line 27, The current
validation in ConnectionValidator (var isValid = response.StatusCode !=
System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Forbidden && response.StatusCode !=
System.Net.HttpStatusCode.NotFound) incorrectly treats many failure statuses as
valid; change the logic to consider only successful HTTP responses as valid by
using response.IsSuccessStatusCode (or checking StatusCode is in the 2xx range)
inside the same method that performs the request, and ensure you handle a
null/failed response appropriately before checking IsSuccessStatusCode.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated connection validation